🧭 Method — How to Decide
From “I should automate this” to “this is what I’m going to build” — a 6-step framework for making automation decisions clearly and without waste.
Detailed content
Find the Constraint
Where every intelligent automation decision starts
Before building anything, you need to know where the pain is. Don’t automate what’s on the wrong path. Find the real bottleneck — or the real opportunity — using two questions that force your brain out of reactive mode.
EAD — Eliminate, Automate, Delegate
The sequence that separates smart operators from those who automate waste
The order matters. Many people jump straight to "automate" without asking whether that task should exist. The result: you spend time building a machine that does something useless more efficiently.
- ✓Eliminate first: "What if we simply stopped doing this?"
- ✓If no one would notice → kill the task
- ✓Automate later what was left
- ✓Finally, Delegate what’s complex or requires human judgment
- ✗Automating without asking whether the task should exist
- ✗Delegate to AI what should be eliminated
- ✗Automating workflows that change every week
- ✗Delegate critical judgment to an AI without supervision
Don’t automate waste. An unnecessary task done with AI is just an unnecessary task done faster. The value lies in eliminating it first.
60/30/10 Golden Rule
The realistic distribution of any mature AI operation
Full automation is rarely the real goal — and anyone promising 100% is selling you something. Smart operations have three distinct tracks that coexist, and deciding which task goes in which track is the most important decision before you build.
Map your 10 most frequent tasks and classify each into one of the 3 tiers. If more than 50% fall into “manual” without a clear reason, you have a level 1 opportunity. If more than 80% are in the fully automated tier, review whether you have enough supervision.
Map the Process (5 elements)
If you can’t explain it to a person, you can’t explain it to AI
Before opening any automation tool, you need to be able to describe the process from start to finish using 5 elements. This map is the minimum spec for any automation that will work.
Explain the process out loud to someone who doesn't understand AI. If you get stuck, there's a vague point. Move on only when you can narrate the 5 elements without pausing.
Autonomy Spectrum (L0→L4)
Workflows beat agents — move up a level only after proving the previous one
There is a temptation to jump straight to autonomous agents (L4) because it seems more impressive. That choice is almost always wrong. The correct default is the lowest level that solves the problem. Move up only after proving that the level below worked and showed its limits.
- ✓Default = the lowest level that works
- ✓Prove L2 before moving up to L3
- ✓Workflows beat agents (prefer deterministic)
- ✓Document escalation criteria at L3
- ✗Starting at L4 "because it seems more powerful"
- ✗Skip steps without validating the previous level
- ✗Using an agent where a workflow is enough
- ✗L4 without defined intervention criteria
Tie It to a KPI
If your automation doesn’t move a number, why build it?
Every automation must justify its existence with a real number. "Because it’s cool" isn’t a business case. Without a KPI, you don’t know if it worked, can’t prioritize the next one, and can’t defend the time invested.
"If I build this and it works perfectly, what specific number will change?" If you can’t answer in one sentence, take a step back and reframe the question. Building without a KPI is work without direction.
🧭 Module Summary
Next Module:
1.3 — Machine (How to Build and Operate) 🛠️ — From decisions to actual implementation: stacks, tools, and the continuous operations cycle.