INEMA.CLUBPRODev with AI v6.2 enter the course

AI Development v6.2 · Claude + Codex

One does the work, the other checks

Generating is easy now; the work is checking. You’ll put together your own pilot with a briefing, a critiqued plan, a review of what changed, tests, and acceptance, choosing the model and effort for each step.

start now →

6 modules · 30 lessons of ~15 minutes · at your own pace

A developer and an operations analyst review a printed sheet with handwritten marks together, beside two open laptops.

What you’ll be able to do

Criteria before codea briefing with a goal, what’s in and out of scope, acceptance criteria, and limits you can check.
Cross-review that countsone model does the work, the other examines the actual work, and the tests and you decide.
Costs under controlmodel and effort chosen for each step, with time and usage measured in your pilot.

Who it’s for

This is for you if you

  • Already use Claude Code or Codex and accept the result because it looks right.
  • Deliver code, automation, or reports made with AI to other people.
  • Prefer to learn by doing.

This isn’t for you if you

  • Want to switch from one assistant to the other: see the Claude → Codex course.
  • Want traditional video lessons.

Lessons

Module 1 · Validation is the work

Replace “looks right” with “I checked it this way.”
5 lessons · 68 min

Module 2 · Plan and critique

The plan is in a file, critiqued by the other model using that same file.
5 lessons · 71 min

Module 3 · Build and review the diff

One builds in stages; the other reviews the diff against the briefing and the tests.
5 lessons · 71 min

Module 4 · Verify and decide

Relevant tests, real behavior, and human judgment.
5 lessons · 70 min

Module 5 · Continuity: handoff and prime

Switch sessions or models without explaining everything again.
5 lessons · 73 min

Module 6 · Models, effort, and budget

Choose a model and effort level for each stage, and measure cost × results.
5 lessons · 70 min

start with lesson 1 →