PTENES
MODULE 3.2

📊 /audit: Four-Cs Diagnosis

Watch the score rise. Run /audit, understand the score, prioritize gaps by leverage, and turn the diagnosis into action every week.

7
Topics
35
Minutes
Beginner
Level
Diagnosis
Type
/audit — Four-Cs Scoreboard illustrative · total: 100 pts · each C is worth up to 25 Context 20/25 Strong Connections 14/25 Thin Capabilities 15/25 Solid Cadence 8/25 Missing Total: 57 / 100 — Stage 1: Built 0 6 12 18 25

Illustrative values. Your /audit generates your AIOS's actual scorecard.

Detailed content

1

What /audit does

O /audit is a diagnostic skill that scans your AIOS structure and returns a score from 0 to 100. It reads — never writes — every file that makes up the system: manual, memory, skills, agents, MCPs, decisions, and references. The central question is simple: "is the AIOS well-built?"

✓ What /audit does

  • ✓Reads manuals, memory, skills, agents, and MCPs
  • ✓Score each C from 0 to 25 (total 100)
  • ✓List gaps prioritized by leverage
  • ✓Save audits/audit-{data}.md (optional)

✗ What /audit DOESN’T do

  • ✗Doesn’t write any system files (read-only)
  • ✗Doesn’t run skills or agents during the audit
  • ✗Doesn’t evaluate the quality of the automations themselves
  • ✗Doesn’t suggest new automations (that’s /level-up)
Read-only
Never modifies files
0–100 pts
25 points per C
Structural
Form, not function
Gaps
By leverage
2

Structural, not capability

There is a critical distinction that most users confuse the first time: /audit measures whether the AIOS is well built (structure), not whether it can do something new (capability). The question "could you build an automatic daily brief?" is about /level-up, not /audit.

🎯 The Fundamental Division

Structural (/audit)
  • → Does CLAUDE.md exist, and does it have completed sections?
  • → Are all 7 connection domains covered?
  • → Is there at least 1 recurring trigger?
  • → Are at least 3 skills working?
Capability (/level-up)
  • → Should there be a weekly briefing skill?
  • → Do you need an email triage agent?
  • → Is CRM update automation missing?
  • → What is the next highest-impact automation?
💡
Practical tip

If /audit returns gaps like "you could build X," note them and take them to /level-up. The audit is a mirror for structure—not a strategy consultant. Using them in the same session creates scope confusion.

Form
/audit measures this
Function
/level-up expands this
Distinction
Don’t mix the two
Workflow
Audit → Level-up
3

How the 4 Cs are scored

Each C is scored from 0 to 25. The /audit checks specific criteria in each dimension—it’s not subjective. Below are the exact criteria that determine your score.

Scoring criteria — /audit
Context (0–25)
• CLAUDE.md exists and has completed sections +8
• Defined identity/voice +4
• Memory (.claude/memory.md or similar) +5
• References (.claude/references/) +4
• Documented decisions +4
Connections (0–25)
• Coverage of the 7 connection domains +14
• API guides / tool docs +4
• Freshness (last updated < 30 days) +4
• Well-defined read/write balance +3
Capabilities (0–25)
• 3+ active skills (.claude/skills/) +9
• 1+ custom skill (not from the standard kit) +8
• 1+ agent (.claude/agents/) +8
Cadence (0–25)
• Recurring trigger configured +10
• Recent activity (last 7 days) +8
• Workflow templates +7
illustrative recreation of the criteria — exact values depend on the kit version
Context
Manual, voice, memory
Connections
7 domains, freshness
Capabilities
Skills + agents
Cadence
Triggers, activity
4

Stages — score ranges

The total score (0–100) falls into 4 stages. Each stage has a name, a range, and a practical interpretation of the AIOS state. Most new projects fall between 40 and 70—that’s expected progress, not a failure.

Score Stage Name
0–39 Stage 0 Foundation
40–69 Stage 1 Built
70–89 Stage 2 Compounding
90–100 Stage 3 Autonomous
Stage 0 0–39 Stage 1 40–69 Built Stage 2 70–89 Compounding Stage 3 90–100 Autonomous 95 = flex 💪 illustrative
0–39
Foundation
40–69
Built
70–89
Compounding
90–100
Autonomous
5

Gaps by leverage

/audit doesn’t list gaps in random order. It uses a leverage formula to prioritize what to address first: leverage = points lost × impact multiplier. The 3 highest-leverage gaps come with a concrete next step.

Leverage formula
leverage = points_lost × multiplier
points_lost = 25 − score_from_C
multiplier → depends on the type of gap:
0 Tier-1 domains (email, calendar, files) → ×4
Shallow CLAUDE.md / no sections → ×3
without custom skills → ×2
everything read-only (no writes) → ×2
without a recurring trigger → ×2
illustrative recreation of the prioritization logic

Example: prioritized Top-3 gaps

1
Missing Tier-1 connections leverage: 44

Email and calendar aren’t connected. They block higher-ROI automations.

Next step: adicionar MCP Gmail + Google Calendar
2
Shallow CLAUDE.md leverage: 27

Identity and decision sections are nearly empty. Every session starts from scratch.

Next step: expandir seções Business, Voice, Decisions
3
No custom skills leverage: 16

Only the 3 skills in the kit. None customized for the business.

Next step: /level-up → criar 1 skill de brief semanal
💡
Don’t solve everything at once

The gap list may have 8–12 items. Focus only on the Top-3 in leverage. Fixing the first usually raises the score by 10–15 points and changes the ranking of the others. Re-run /audit after each improvement.

Leverage
pts × multiplier
Top-3
Always the focus
Next-step
Concrete by gap
Rerun
After each improvement
6

Read-only + scoreboard

/audit is strictly read-only—it never changes system files. The only optional write effect is saving the result to audits/audit-{data}.md to track score changes week by week. The format uses bars ## every 5 points with descriptive labels.

audits/audit-2026-06-01.md — illustrative
# /audit — AIS-OS Score · 2026-06-01
 
## Context (20/25)
████████████████████░░░░░ Strong
+ complete manual, active memory, references OK
- insufficiently detailed decisions (-5)
 
## Connections (14/25)
██████████████░░░░░░░░░░░ Thin
+ connected files, Notion
- email, calendar, CRM missing (-11)
 
## Capabilities (15/25)
███████████████░░░░░░░░░░ Solid
+ 3 active kit skills
- 0 custom skills, 0 agents (-10)
 
## Cadence (8/25)
████████░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░ Missing
- no recurring trigger, no templates (-17)
 
TOTAL: 57/100 — Stage 1: Built
 
## Top-3 gaps (by leverage)
1. Missing Tier-1 connections → leverage 44 → add MCP Gmail+Cal
2. Shallow CLAUDE.md → leverage 27 → expand sections
3. No custom skills → leverage 16 → /level-up

✓ Scoreboard best practices

  • ✓Save the audit every week in audits/
  • ✓Compare the current score with last week’s
  • ✓Celebrate every +5 points — that’s real progress

✗ Common pitfalls

  • ✗Don’t ask /audit to “go easy”—honesty is the point
  • ✗Don’t try to resolve 8 gaps at once
  • ✗Don’t forget to rerun after each improvement
## bars
Visual format
Labels
Strong/Solid/Thin/Missing
Weekly
Progress tracking
Honest
Never generous
7

Weekly ritual

/audit is the compounding hook of AIOS. The first run establishes the baseline on Day 7. From then on, you run it every week, resolve the Top-1 leverage item, and watch the score climb. This is the cycle that turns a setup into a system.

Weekly audit cycle

Day 7
First run — baseline

Run /audit for the first time. Accept the score without judging it. Save it in audits/audit-semana-1.md. This is ground zero.

Mon
Review the previous week’s Top 1

Open the latest audit.md. What was the Top-1 leverage item? Was it resolved? Note the status before opening a new session.

/audit
Run the /audit

Run the skill. A new score is generated. Compare it with last week's. How much did it increase? A new Top-3 leverage list is identified.

→
Hand off to /level-up

Take the Top-1 leverage point from /audit and move it straight to /level-up. One gap → one automation. Close the loop for the week.

💡
The compounding effect is real

Resolve 1 high-leverage gap per week. In 4 weeks, an AIOS Stage 1 (57 pts) typically reaches Stage 2 (75+ pts). The rising score is evidence that the system is working — not the individual automation.

Day 7
Baseline
Weekly
Fixed ritual
Top-1
→ /level-up
Compounding
Score goes up

📊 Module Summary

✓
/audit is read-only — reads the structure, never writes to the AIOS operating system
✓
Structural, not capability — measures whether the AIOS is well-built (form), not what it can do (function)
✓
4 Cs, 25 points each — Context, Connections, Capabilities, and Cadence add up to 100 points total
✓
4 maturity stages — Foundation (0–39), Built (40–69), Compounding (70–89), Autonomous (90–100)
✓
Leverage = pts × multiplier — prioritizes the Top 3 highest-impact gaps with a concrete next step
✓
Weekly ritual — Day 7 = baseline, then /audit every week, Top-1 goes to /level-up, score rises

Next Module: 3.3 — /level-up

You understand the diagnosis. Now you’ll learn to build 1 automation per week using /level-up — the growth engine of your AIOS. Each run = 1 artifact. Each week = a more capable AIOS.