PagesThe ideaPossible forms of the systemTechnical base optionsOpen design questionsLimits and securityPersonalities and profilesUse scenariosScenario 1: Local use: me and my agentsScenario 2: Me, my agents and guestsScenario 3: Company: one departmentScenario 4: The whole companyScenario 5: GamesScenario 6: Customers and suppliersPossibilities for companiesPossibilities for gamesThe INEMA case (for discussion)Sources

Scenario 4: The whole company

Who: all departments, managers, agents per area and maybe a "company" agent that knows policies and processes.

A typical day - Each department has its channels and agents (scenario 3 repeated). - There are cross-department channels (#sales-finance), where the sales agent asks the finance agent for the status of a payment. - Leadership receives a weekly summary per department, written by the agents. - The new employee talks to the onboarding agent.

What becomes mandatory - Governance: who creates agents, who connects systems, who approves publishing. - Audit: a record of everything each agent did and at whose request. MeshAgent highlights "fully traceable" [9]. - Strong identity: each agent with its own key and permissions, as in Buzz [1]. - Cost per area: panel by department, person and agent. - Integration with the company login and internal systems.

Possibilities - 4a: expand department by department from scenario 3. The video and the reports cited indicate this works better than everyone at once. - 4b: a single platform from the start, with central rules. - 4c: each department with its own tool and a "bridge" agent that links them all.

Risks: wrong permission exposed to many people, cost out of control and resistance from people.

Makes sense when: at least one department (scenario 3) has already proven value.